By Abdulwaheed Lawal
In response to the article titled “STILL ON OYO STATE GUBERNATORIAL RACE IN 2027, BAYO ADELABU’S YEAR OF GLORY AND CALL FOR POWER SHIFT AGENDA TO OKE-OGUN” by Mutalubi Ojo Adebayo, SAN, published on April 30, 2025, I wish to address several assertions made regarding Oloye Adebayo Adelabu’s candidacy and the advocacy for a power shift to Oke-Ogun.
The article projects Adelabu’s emergence as Oyo State’s next governor as a foregone conclusion, citing divine revelation and destiny. It further calls for a power shift to Oke-Ogun, positioning the zone as deserving of the governorship slot. While robust debate on leadership and zoning is healthy for democracy, the tone and approach of the article raise important concerns.
Critique of Campaign Approach
The portrayal of Adelabu’s victory as inevitable risks alienating other aspirants and their supporters, as it may be perceived as an attempt to impose a candidate rather than encourage open contest.
Framing the election outcome as predestined undermines the spirit of democracy, where every qualified aspirants should have a fair opportunity to compete.
The confrontational language and personal attacks within the article could provoke unnecessary division and backlash, both within the party and among the electorate.
Heavy reliance on claims of destiny, rather than focusing on policies and competence, may not resonate with voters who prioritize merit and democratic values.
Potential Impact on APC and Adelabu’s Prospects
Such divisive rhetoric could weaken party unity and deter undecided voters, inadvertently harming Adelabu’s chances at the polls.
The All Progressives Congress (APC) must be mindful of the need for inclusive and issue-based campaigns to maintain cohesion and broad appeal ahead of the 2027 elections.
On the Call for Power Shift to Oke-Ogun
The argument for a power shift to Oke-Ogun reflects a longstanding debate about equitable representation in Oyo State politics.
Oke-Ogun, with its significant population and political relevance, has never produced a governor, making the call for rotation a legitimate subject for party deliberation.
However, any advocacy for zoning should be conducted in a manner that unites rather than divides, and should not preclude the democratic rights of aspirants from other zones.
In conclusion, while every candidate and region has the right to advocate for leadership, the process must remain open, democratic, and respectful of all stakeholders. The future of Oyo State’s leadership should be determined by the will of the people through a fair and credible electoral process.
Barrister Abdulwaheed Lawal sent this piece from Ibadan
