The Supreme Court of Nigeria on Thursday, granted financial Autonomy to the 774 local government areas across the country.
The Apex Court has barred the 36 governors of the federation from further retaining or utilizing funds that are meant for the 774 Local Government Areas in the country.
The judgement declared that it is illegal and unconstitutional for governors to continue to receive and seize funds allocated to local government areas in their states.
It maintained that the “dubious practice” which has gone on for over two decades, was a clear violation of Section 162 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.
In its lead judgement that was delivered by Justice Emmanuel Agim this morning, the apex court held that no House of Assembly of any state has the power to make laws that could, in any manner, interfere with monies meant for the local government areas.
Stressing that the law mandated that Local Government Areas must be governed by democratically elected officials, the Supreme Court ordered that forthwith, funds meant for the LGAs must be directly paid to them from the federation account.
“Demands of justice require a progressive interpretation of the law. It is the position of this court that the federation can pay local government allocations to the Loca Government Areas directly or pay them through the states.
“In this case, since paying them through states has not worked, justice of this case demands that Local Government Areas allocations from the federation account should henceforth be paid directly to the LGAs,” the apex court held.
It further declared unconstitutional the appointment of caretaker committees by governors to run the affairs of the Local Government Areas.
It held that the 36 states are under obligation to ensure democratic governance at the third tier of government.
The judgement followed a suit the Federal Government filed against the 36 governors to secure financial autonomy for the 774 Local Government Areas.
Earlier, the court dismissed preliminary objections the state governors filed to challenge the competence of the suit
